The comparability of onscreen and paper and pencil tests: no further research required?

  1. American Educational Research Association. (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington: American Educational Research Association.
  2. Bennett, R. E. (1997). Re-inventing Assessment. Educational Testing Services.
  3. Bugbee Jr., A. C. (1996). The equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computer-based testing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 282–299.
  4. Bunderson, C. V., Inouye, D. K., & Olsen, J. B. (1988). The four generations of computerized educational measurement. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational Measurement. New York: Macmillan.
  5. Clariana, R., & Wallace, P. (2002). Paper-based versus computer-based assessment: key factors associated with test mode effect. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 593-602.
  6. Kveton, P., Jelinek, M., Voboril, D., & Klimusova, H. (2007). Computer-based tests: the impact of test design and problem of equivalency. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 32-51.
  7. MacCann, R. (2006). The equivalence of online and traditional testing for different subpopulations and item types. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 79-91.
  8. MacDonald, A. S. (2001). The impact of individual differences on the equivalence of computer-based and paper-and-pencil educational assessments. Computers & Education, 39, 299-312.
  9. Mazzeo, J., & Harvey, A. L. (1988). The Equivalence of Scores from Automated and Conventional Educational and Psychological Tests: A Review of the Literature. College Board Publications: College Board Report No. 88-8.
  10. Mead, A. D., & Drasgow, F. (1993). Equivalence of Computerized and Paper-and-Pencil Cognitive-Ability Tests - a Metaanalysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 449-458.
  11. Pomplun, M., Frey, S., & Becker, D. F. (2002). The score equivalence of paper-and-pencil and computerized versions of a speeded test of reading comprehension. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(2), 337-354.
  12. Smith, B., & Caputi, P. (2007). Cognitive interference model of computer anxiety: Implications for computer-based assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1481-1498.
  13. Verhelst, N. D., Glas, C. A. W., & Verstralen, H. H. F. M. (1995). One-parameter logistic model: OPLM. Arnhem: CITO.
  14. Wang, S. D., Jiao, H., Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of testing mode effects in grade K-12 mathematics tests. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(2), 219-238.
  15. Wise, S. L., & Plake, B. S. (1989). Research on the Effects of Administering Tests via Computers (Vol. 8, pp. 5-10).