Students' approaches to learning and their performance in the Extended Project pilot

  1. Assessment and Qualification Alliance (AQA). 2008. Extended Project Qualification (Level 3) Available online  (accessed October 9, 2008).
  2. Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. 1986. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173–1182. 
  3. Biggs, J. B. 1987a. Learning Process Questionnaire: Manual, Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  4. Biggs, J. B. 1987b. Student approaches to learning and studying, Hawthorn, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  5. Biggs, J. B. 1993. What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(1): 3–19.
  6. Biggs, J. B. 2001. “Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach?”. In Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles, Edited by: Sternberg, R. J. and Zhang, L. F. 73–102. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  7. Biggs, J. B, Kember, D. and Leung, D. Y.P. 2001. The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1): 133–149. 
  8. Black, P. and Wiliam, D. 1998. Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1): 7–74. 
  9. Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. F., Guzdial, M. and Palincsar, A. 1991. Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3/4): 369–398.
  10. Boaler, J. 1998. Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1): 41–62. 
  11. Brookhart, S. M., Walsh, J. M. and Zientarski, W. A. 2006. The dynamics of motivation and effort for classroom assessments in middle school science and social studies. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(2): 151–184. 
  12. Cano, F. 2005. Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2): 203–221. 
  13. Cano, F. 2007. Approaches to learning and study orchestrations in high school students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(2): 131–151. 
  14. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. and Furnham, A. 2008. Personality, intelligence and approaches to learning as predictors of academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(7): 1596–603. 
  15. Clark, L. 2006. Boys are being failed by our schools. Daily Mail, June 13, MailOnline. Available online (accessed October 22, 2008)
  16. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. and Ecclestone, K. 2004a. Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning: A systematic and critical review, London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
  17. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E. and Ecclestone, K. 2004b. Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice, London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
  18. Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior, New York: Plenum Press.
  19. Department for Education and Skills (DfES). 2005. 14–19 Education and Skills Available online (accessed September 15, 2008).
  20. Drew, S. 2001. Student perceptions of what helps them learn and develop in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3): 309–331. 
  21. d'Ydewalle, G., Swerts, A. and De Corte, E. 1983. Study time and test performance as a function of test expectations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(1): 55–67. 
  22. Ecclestone, K. 2004. Learning in a comfort zone: Cultural and social capital inside an outcome-based assessment regime. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(1): 29–47. 
  23. Ecclestone, K. 2007. Commitment, compliance and comfort zones: The effects of formative assessment on vocational education students' learning careers. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3): 315–333. 
  24. Elwood, J. 1999. Equity issues in performance assessment: The contribution of teacher-assessed coursework to gender-related differences in examination performance. Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(4): 321–344.
  25. Entwistle, N. J. 2001. Styles of learning and approaches to studying in higher education. Kybernetes, 30(5/6): 593–602.
  26. Entwistle, N. J. and Entwistle, A. 1991. Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: The student experience and its implications. Higher Education, 22(3): 205–227. 
  27. Entwistle, N. J. and McCune, V. 2004. The conceptual bases of study strategy inventories. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4): 325–345. 
  28. Entwistle, N. J., Meyer, J. H.F. and Tait, H. 1991. Student failure: Disintegrated patterns of study strategies and perceptions of the learning environment. Higher Education, 21: 249–261. 
  29. Gijbels, D., Van de Watering, G., Dochy, F. and Van den Bossche, P. 2005. The relationship between students' approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4): 327–341. 
  30. Harlen, W. and Deakin Crick, R. 2002. A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students' motivation for learning (EPPI-Centre Review, version 1.1), London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education.
  31. Kember, D., Biggs, J. and Leung, D. Y.P. 2004. Examining the multi-dimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2): 261–280. 
  32. Kember, D., Wong, A. and Leung, D. Y.P. 1999. Reconsidering the dimensions of approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(3): 323–343. 
  33. Kucharski, G. A., Rust, J. O. and Ring, T. R. 2005. Evaluation of the Ecological, Futures and Global (EFG) curriculum: A project-based approach. Education, 125(4): 652–668.
  34. Liu, W. C., Wang, C. K.J., Tan, O. S., Ee, J. and Koh, C. 2009. Understanding students' motivation in project work: A 2 × 2 achievement goal approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1): 87–106. 
  35. Marton, F. and Säljö, R. 1976a. On qualitative differences in learning. I. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1): 4–11. 
  36. Marton, F. and Säljö, R. 1976b. On qualitative differences in learning: II. Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(2): 115–127. 
  37. Marton, F. and Säljö, R. 1997. “Approaches to learning”. In The experience of learning, Edited by: Marton, F., Hounsell, D. J. and Entwistle, N. J. 39–58. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
  38. O'Donoghue, C., Thomas, S., Goldstein, H. and Knight, T. 1997. 1996 DfEE study of value added for 16–18 year olds in England, London: HMSO.
  39. Phan, H. P. and Deo, B. 2007. The revised Learning Process Questionnaire: A validation of a western model of students' study approaches to the South Pacific context using confirmatory factor analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3): 719–739. 
  40. Pinot de Moira, A. 2002. Statistical robustness in comparability studies: The choice of model and data selection. Guildford, UK, AQA research report.
  41. Pinot de Moira, A. 2007. Extended Project evaluation (Cohort 1): Coordinator interviews. Guildford, UK, AQA research report.
  42. Pinot de Moira, A. 2008a. EPQ teacher support meetings. Guildford, UK, AQA research report.
  43. Pinot de Moira, A. 2008b. Extended Project evaluation (Cohort 2): Student information. Guildford, UK, AQA research report.
  44. Pinot de Moira, A. and Tremain, K. 2008. Extended Project (Cohort 3) and Project Qualification (Levels 1 and 2): Student evaluation. Guildford, UK, AQA research report.
  45. Pintrich, P. R. 2004. A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4): 385–407.
  46. Pintrich, P. R. and Schrauben, B. 1992. “Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks”. In Student perceptions in the classroom, Edited by: Schunk, D. H. and Meece, J. L. 149–183. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  47. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 2006a. Consultation on draft Extended Project criteria: Summary report. Available online (accessed September 15, 2008).
  48. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 2006b. Consultation on the Extended Project (Level 3). Available online (accessed September 15, 2008).
  49. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 2006c. Draft framework and criteria for the Extended Project (Level 3). Available online (accessed September 15, 2008).
  50. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 2008a. An introduction to the Extended Project. Available online (accessed September 15, 2008).
  51. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA). 2008b. The national qualifications framework. Available online (accessed October 23, 2008).
  52. Ross, M. E., Green, S. B., Salisbury-Glennon, J. D. and Tollefson, N. 2006. College students' study strategies as a function of testing: An investigation into metacognitive self-regulation. Innovative Higher Education, 30(5): 361–375.
  53. Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1): 54–67. 
  54. Scouller, K. 1998. The influence of assessment method on students' learning approaches: Multiple-choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35(4): 453–472. 
  55. Severiens, S., Ten Dam, G. and Van Hout Wolters, B. 2001. Stability of processing and regulation strategies: Two longitudinal studies on student learning. Higher Education, 42(4): 437–453. 
  56. Smith, S. N. and Miller, R. J. 2005. Learning approaches: Examination type, discipline of study, and gender. Educational Psychology, 25(1): 43–53. 
  57. Snelgrove, S. and Slater, J. 2003. Approaches to learning: Psychometric testing of a study process questionnaire. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43(5): 496–505. 
  58. Struyven, K., Dochy, F. and Janssens, S. 2005. Students' perceptions about evaluation and assessment in higher education: A review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4): 325–341. 
  59. Thomas, J. W. 2000. A review of research on project-based learning, San Rafael, CA: The Autodesk Foundation. Available online (accessed September 16, 2008).
  60. Torrance, H. and Coultas, J. 2004. Do summative assessment and testing have a positive or negative effect on post-16 learners' motivation for learning in the learning and skills sector? A review of the research literature on assessment in post-compulsory education in the UK, London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
  61. Working Group on 14–19 Reform. 2004. 14–19 curriculum and qualifications reform: Final report of the Working Group on 14–19 Reform, London: Department for Education and Skills.
  62. Yamzon, A. 1999. An examination of the relationship between student choice in project-based learning and achievement, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430940. http://www.eric.ed.gov
  63. Zeegers, P. 2001. Approaches to learning in science: A longitudinal study. British Educational Research Journal, 71(1): 115–132.